The Philosophy of War


Many philosophers disagree over whether war has any moral significance. Some argue that war is an inevitable by-product of man’s biology, while others argue that war has a moral purpose. Augustine, for example, claimed that wars are inevitable, but some also argue that wars may have some moral purposes if they are properly conducted. War, as a natural process, often involves a threat of death and destruction, so philosophers of war have debated whether to emphasize moral ends or moral relations in war. In addition, some thinkers have suggested that the experience of war entails rituals, which can serve to symbolize a transition out of civil society and back in.

The role of resources in war has been argued by many scholars. According to Christopher Coker, Azar Gat, and Quincy Wright, resources have been at the core of wars since ancient times. Early civilisations were dependent on the control of critical resources for their survival. The role of resources in war has been crucial in shaping the nature of human conflict, and has changed with technological advancement. Control of mineral deposits, water supplies, and trade have all been crucial at one time or another.

Although WAR is not a perfect indicator of player value, it is an effective guide in separating groups of players. For example, a player with a 6.4 WAR might be worth between 5.0 and 7.0 WAR. Using WAR as a guide, one might assume that a player worth 6.5 WAR is likely to be an All-Star or MVP.

Another significant continuity in war is the importance of morale. In some cases, forces with distinct advantages have failed because of a breakdown in the cognitive element. They may apply faulty analogies and make inappropriate judgments. Leaders may also suffer doubts or cling to stubborn faith. The importance of morale cannot be overstated.

Another example is the Greek War of Independence, in which a group of Greek revolutionaries fought against the Ottoman Empire. This war had a religious component as many Christians saw it as a holy war against the Muslim Turks. A proxy war occurs when an opposing power fights against one another in a third country. This was common during the Cold War.

To properly classify a war, a person must examine the objectives of both the warring parties. In the case of American Indians, their goals were food and water, while Englishmen fought for land, resources, and economic gain. The former fought to survive, while the latter fought to establish power and egotistic ideas.

War has many consequences. It affects a person’s health, education, and home. Supplies of food and water are disrupted, while the legal system becomes weaker. Freedom of speech and press are also severely compromised. The rights of women, minorities, and refugees are often deprived.