About Russian Vs Ukraine

Russia’s military adventure in Ukraine has been a disaster. It has killed thousands of civilians, destroyed homes, schools, hospitals and cultural sites in areas occupied by the Kremlin’s forces, and committed a litany of abuses that could constitute war crimes. And, in a clear violation of international humanitarian law, Russian or Russia-affiliated forces have used indiscriminate and disproportionate bombing and shelling to terrorize the population and to destabilize public order.

The Kremlin’s gamble was that enough Ukrainians, particularly in the largely Russian-speaking east, would embrace some form of reintegration into Russia’s sphere of influence because of shared cultural, linguistic, religious and other ties. It is a calculation that has proved spectacularly wrong.

Moreover, the conflict has created new risks for China. As the United States focuses on limiting Russia’s success within Ukraine, Beijing is well positioned to take advantage of Washington’s withdrawal from the region and to pursue its own strategic ambitions in Asia.

Moscow also failed to anticipate the political will among Western democracies to oppose its strategy of “hybrid warfare.” They united behind a set of tough economic and trade sanctions against Putin, his oligarchs, and their companies. And, despite high energy prices, the strain of hosting millions of refugees, and concerns about how long the conflict might last, European support for Ukraine has not waned. Even the Kremlin’s hints of nuclear escalation have not weakened Western resolve. Against this backdrop, the West has no choice but to maintain its pressure on Russia in all forums and to offer Ukraine increased weapons and defensive capabilities.

World News is the term for international journalism (although world news might also be called foreign coverage in some countries). With the advent of telegraphy in the 17th century, newspaper publishers could begin to bring in news from abroad. As a consequence, newspapers began to specialize in a number of fields—foreign affairs being the most famous.

Similarly, news agencies emerged as specialized divisions of traditional newspapers or media outlets. The emergence of the era of international telecommunications, including satellites and telephones, further facilitated world news coverage. This field covers a broad range of events and topics, including politics, foreign relations, business, technology, sports, and more. Some of the world’s best journalists work in this area of reporting.

The world is a big place, so there’s no shortage of news to cover. But there are different kinds of world news that may be more relevant for your audience than others. A key distinction is between what’s considered “world” news and what’s considered “national” news. A nation’s government and its institutions are considered part of the national fabric, so news about them is typically included in national coverage. However, if a country is embroiled in a war or hosting an international summit, those stories are often classified as world news.

What’s more, many stories that are world news have roots that extend back decades or even centuries. These stories provide historical context for current events and developments.

For example, the story of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya has a rich history that precedes and informs it. As the family members of Israeli hostages held by Hamas kick off a 24-hour protest call on Israel to bring their loved ones home, NPR’s Daniel Estrin looks back at how far this conflict has come in 100 days of fighting.

WORLD readers and listeners are thoughtful believers who want to be informed about the news that matters most. We’re dedicated to providing you with sound journalism that’s grounded in biblical truth and a biblical perspective on the issues that affect you most.

World news is the general term for news that is not national or local. It includes international relations, political developments, and economic stories from around the globe. These events are often covered by the major news agencies. A journalist who specializes in world news is called a correspondent, and may work full-time as a foreign correspondent for a major news organization.

Some schools have reopened and limited garbage collection resumed in parts of Japan’s northcentral region hit by a deadly earthquake. The family of a Canadian woman abducted by the Taliban says her captors have a video recording of her that would be released Monday. Israel’s military claims some gains in its more than three months of bombardment of Gaza, but the Palestinian death toll continues to climb.

WORLD readers and listeners are thoughtful believers who want to competently talk about the news and its impact on our lives. They understand that the truth demands a biblical context and that God is at work, no matter what the headlines say. They are motivated to pray and serve others, led by the Spirit. You can perpetuate WORLD’s sound journalism by subscribing or making a tax-deductible donation. Thank you! For more information about our donors, please click here. You can also follow WORLD on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. You can also contact us by email, letter, or phone. We welcome your comments and feedback. Thank you for supporting our mission of bringing biblically grounded news to life.

Conflict is a normal part of human interactions, and it can range in severity from minor disagreements to knock-down drag-out fights. When it’s handled well, conflict can help people to stand up for their beliefs and to find new ways to solve problems. However, if it’s not managed well, it can lead to anger, hurt feelings and divisiveness.

There are several different types of conflicts, including interpersonal, intergroup, and organizational. In general, they involve opposing sides and different viewpoints. Conflicts are usually triggered by an event or situation that makes one side feel threatened, and they can be caused by any number of things, from cultural differences to lack of communication.

The first step in resolving conflict is to identify the issues at hand. This can be done by analyzing the problem, evaluating the people involved, and determining the root cause. It is also important to consider whether the issue is a problem that can be solved or if it is more intractable and requires long-term change.

Once a list of potential solutions has been created, it is time to begin the negotiation process. During this stage, it is critical to remember that the goal is not to win the conflict, but rather to resolve the issues in a way that will satisfy everyone. This means that all parties will need to be willing to make compromises and take into consideration the other side’s point of view.

A common reason for workplace conflicts is poor communication. In this case, it may be that instructions are not clear, or that one person is unable to understand the other’s tone of voice or body language. It is important to address these issues in order to prevent further misunderstandings and to build stronger working relationships.

In addition to addressing communication issues, it is important to examine the interests of each party and find a solution that suits all of them. Too often, groups spend more time trying to “bargain over their position” than they do identifying what their interests are and finding a solution that will satisfy those interests.

Conflicts are a key part of plot development. They are what drives your protagonist to make the choices that form the backbone of your story. They can be a battle against another character or a fight against an impersonal force like a natural disaster. The type of conflict you choose and how your character responds to it will reveal a great deal about them.

If you’re having trouble resolving conflict in your life, BetterHelp is here to help. Their online counseling service matches you with a licensed therapist who can discuss your concerns and help you develop strategies to overcome them. Start your free trial today! It only takes a few minutes to get started. They can even connect you with a therapist in your area. The sooner you seek help, the sooner you can put your conflict behind you. And once the resolution is found, you can move forward with your life.

When it comes to understanding War, few thinkers have had as much influence as Carl von Clausewitz. His On War is widely viewed as the classic text on the subject.

Clausewitz defines War as a continual and systematic use of collective physical violence between at least two organised groups, and that it is always intended to cause maximum harm. Compared with quantitative definitions of conflict and war (such as those that refer to a threshold of 200 killed soldiers), this qualitative approach has an advantage in that it focuses on the inner logic of the violent actions rather than their external consequences.

Modernising European states hoped that they could make their wars more civilised, less destructive, and more controlled by a system of military ethics and a rationalisation of the objectives of belligerents. They were also able to expand their diplomatic contacts and thus become better informed about the world beyond their borders, making their resort to war more of a calculated decision, rather than a spontaneous reaction to perceived threats.

Nonetheless, even the most modernising European states could not escape the fact that War was still an intrinsic part of human nature. Whether they wanted to or not, they could not avoid a struggle against their neighbours and with people half-way around the world, as long as they lived in a pre-agricultural hunter-gatherer lifestyle.

This basic truth has not changed since, and it applies to all modern societies and countries, from the tyrannical dictatorships of Africa to the fractious alliances between democratic and authoritarian regimes in the Middle East. Some of these wars are ambitious, requiring massive effort and evoking huge destruction; others seek only marginal advantages and show little hostility; and, if fought between nuclear powers, can be an existential threat to the very survival of humanity.

To understand these different types of conflict, it is necessary to break down the concept of War into its component parts and study their inter-relationships. This is not easy. On the one hand, there are those on the far right of the political spectrum who, like fascists, argue that a strong nation is entitled to whatever it can take by force; and there are those on the left who, like Marxists, see war as an expression of economic interest. Both of these approaches are flawed, because they do not take into account the many other ways that human beings cause and suffer from war. This article argues for a third option, based on contextual common denominators that can be applied to all types of warfare and all states. It is not easy to test this theory of course, but it will be a valuable tool for historians and other students of War. A PDF version of this essay is available here. David Harvey, 2017. All rights reserved. This work may be reproduced for educational purposes only with attribution to the author and a link to this website. Please request permission from the publisher for any other use.

In August 1914 the world exploded into a war that would last four years and kill nearly nine million soldiers. By its end it would change the world forever. The conflict had many causes. It started with the assassination of Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand, a move blamed by some leaders on Serbian nationalists. But it also reflected the fact that nations had spent enormous sums on building huge armies and navies in an arms race, creating tensions between countries. It was a war of empires, as major powers sought to expand their territories and influence in the world.

The assassination triggered a chain reaction in which Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, then allied with Germany and Russia against France, a move that put the other major powers into a deadly tangle of alliances. The situation became even more complicated as a series of diplomatic crises and diplomatic squabbles erupted, threatening to plunge the world into a global conflict.

In addition, economic pressures brought about a rise in aggressive nationalism, with Germany seeking to reverse the Treaty of Versailles and Japan seeking empire and resources. The result was a world divided into two opposing military alliances: the Allies led by Britain and her empire, the United States and the Soviet Union, against the Axis Powers of Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and Imperial Japan. As a result, the Allies won the war and the Axis Powers lost. But it was a terrible price. It cost about 65 million lives, both military and civilian, and wiped out entire civilizations.

The war of words between the two nuclear-armed superpowers has rekindled Cold War levels of brinksmanship, suspicion and gamesmanship. It also revives questions about whether the U.S. military can handle another large-scale fight, given its aging equipment and reliance on volunteer conscripts.

The United States has the world’s largest military budget and a global network of bases, giving it the technological edge over Russia. But that does not mean the USA is invincible. In a conventional war, which both nations have in their arsenals, the Russian army would be much more successful than the American one.

But a conventional war between the two countries is unlikely. In most cases, political leaders want to avoid a direct military conflict between NATO and Russia, and most wars end with diplomacy and negotiations that result in a negotiated settlement. The White House has already started to pressure Putin with sanctions targeting a handful of banks, oligarchs, political elites, government-owned enterprises and Putin himself.

In terms of the weapons they possess, the US has a vastly superior Navy and Air Force, plus a better quality ground army, Marine Corps and overall logistics. The US also outperforms Russia in scientific research, with the USA ranking first in entomology and aerospace engineering, and second in genetics and medical sciences.

Former Vice President and current Republican presidential hopeful Mike Pence says that, if elected, he would make sure Ukraine receives whatever military aid is needed to turn back the Russian invasion. In an appearance on the Hugh Hewitt Show, Pence said that Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine is “not just warfare. It’s evil,” and he promised that as president, he would ensure Ukraine gets all the military aid it needs.

Ukrainians are proud of their land and its rich history. But the nation has also been beset by war and economic decline. Since gaining independence after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine has swung between seeking closer integration with Western Europe and being drawn into Russia’s orbit.

The eastern regions of the country are covered in black, extremely fertile chernozem soils that support huge agrarian economies. In contrast, the northwest and central parts are dominated by sandy podzolized soils, which cannot be farmed easily. The western lands of the former Soviet republic have closer historical ties with Poland and more openness to nationalist sentiment than the east, which has remained close to Russia and still struggles with latent communist legacies and patronage politics.

In the 1st millennium bce, different parts of the region that is today Ukraine were invaded and occupied by Cimmerians, Scythians and Sarmatians, while from the 14th to the 18th century, the land was ruled by Poland, Lithuania and a semi-autonomous state known as the Hetmanate. In the 18th century, Russian rule consolidated its hold over most of the country.

Throughout much of the modern period, the capital, Kiev, was a major center of Orthodox Christianity. The city is still home to numerous impressive monasteries, including the 10th-century Caves on the Berestov Mount.

A typical meal in Ukraine begins with borshch, a thick soup based on beets and other vegetables including carrots, tomatoes, potatoes, cabbage and parsley. It’s often served with pieces of meat and garnished with dill. Another popular soup is zelenyj borshch, which has a similar composition but uses a mixture of red and green beets.

Salads are a staple of the Ukrainian diet, and many are made from locally available ingredients. The most simple is a salad of fresh or salty cucumbers and sauerkraut with onions and oil; the peasants tend to prefer a more varied combination. One of the most famous is Olivier potato salad, the king of any feast in the country (as well as school and government canteens).

The savory side of Ukrainian cuisine is represented by such dishes as chicken kiev, a breaded, deep-fried, stuffed breast of chicken filled with cold herbed butter. Early versions of the dish were stuffed with a more complex filling, similar to that used in a quenelle, and were made with the bone still attached.

A typical sweet Ukrainian dessert is syrniky, pancakes made of cottage cheese. In the west of the country, walnut-stuffed prunes are a favorite; they’re usually soaked in water for a few hours before being stuffed with toasted, crushed walnuts and served with sour cream on the side. For something a little stronger, most Ukrainians will turn to horilka, a strong, clear vodka. The drink is a national pride and is produced in abundance in the country’s north. There are several varieties of the beverage, including plum and herbal flavored ones, but the most popular is the plain, unfiltered variety.

Liberal vs Democrat

A lot of people use the words liberal and democrat interchangeably, however, they are two different things. Liberalism is a political philosophy that promotes individual liberty, equality and freedom of expression. A democrat is an individual who is a member of the Democratic Party, one of the two major political parties in the United States. Democrats tend to support liberal policies, whereas Republicans support conservative ones.

The Democratic Party has long been associated with liberalism, beginning with Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal and subsequent social-democratic platforms that emphasized civil rights for racial minorities and other groups, as well as consumer protection, the environment and progressive taxation. In contrast, Republican philosophy is generally centered around economic libertarianism and social conservatism.

Often, the distinction between Democrats and Republicans is most prominent in terms of their views on the size of government. The majority of Democrats are in favor of a larger government role in economic issues, such as backing regulations and social welfare programs. Republicans, on the other hand, believe that the government should be as small as possible and that it is better to let private companies handle business affairs.

While this distinction is very clear in terms of the two major political parties, there are plenty of individuals who fall somewhere in between. Some may call themselves “liberal,” yet support some conservative policies, while others will be considered “conservative” but identify as a Democrat. This is why there are so many variations in opinion on a variety of topics within the Democratic camp, from pro-choice to anti-gun control to more or less supportive of affirmative action and social programs.

Russia is a huge country with an immense variety of natural and man-made attractions. It has some of the world’s most spectacular architecture, museums and art treasures. It is also one of the oldest and most senior republics of the former Soviet Union, with a long history of conflict with neighbours and internal strife between its own ruling classes.

As with most former communist countries, Russia is still recovering from the economic collapse that ended the Soviet era in 1991. A small group of rich business people now dominates the economy, while most ordinary Russians are poorer than they were under communism. The country has vast reserves of oil and other natural resources, but this wealth does not translate into prosperity for most Russians.

The extreme weather has helped to make life difficult for much of the population, and this is reflected in a high rate of mental illness and drug abuse. In addition, there is a significant number of suicides each year, and homicides are common in the major cities.

There are a large number of organised crime groups active in Russia, including drug dealing and extortion. Visitors should exercise caution and limit interactions with strangers. If you become a victim of crime, contact the nearest Canadian Embassy or Consulate.

You will need a valid passport to enter Russia and should be aware of security issues in many parts of the country. There is a threat of terrorist activity, which has resulted in injuries and deaths in the past. Intense public surveillance is in place, and travellers should stay alert at all times.

English is not spoken very widely in Russia, so familiarizing yourself with the Cyrillic alphabet and some basic phrases will make your trip much more enjoyable. Most signs, maps and menus are written in Russian, so learning the language will also help you to navigate your way around.

In the west of the country lies Moscow, an imperial city with 261 museums and a long history of art and culture. Suzdal, a medieval city with more than 40 churches, is another popular attraction.

South of Moscow is the Volga region, with the city of Nizhny Novgorod at its centre. This city has a famous university and is known for its many fine museums. In the north is Murmansk, a cold but scenic town where you can camp in glass domes to watch the northern lights.

East of the Urals is the Russian Far East, with Vladivostok as its main city. The Far East is a region of planned cities, industrial plants and raw-material processing centres. It is linked to Moscow by the Trans-Siberian Railway.

The region is rich in natural resources, particularly oil and gas. It is a frontier, both geographically and in terms of its relationship with the rest of the country. In the north, it borders with North Korea and China.